the one problem with moving the onus of feed curation on to users is people will willingly expose themselves to radicalisation material. the free market of ideas isn't free - some objective lies are unfairly persuasive
what do you mean "unfairly"? ppl certainly want to believe things that suit their ego, etc, but like that's life?
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Jul 19, 2023I'm not sure what happened to them, but some ppl were talking about building feeds that only include a limited number per day from each person you…Reply · Mar 31, 2023@suntzoogway @somewheresy @deepfates @w1redw1tch not forced no but compelled by social conditioning not to ignore someone who mentions them. you're…Reply · Jun 30, 2023@astralwalkk my theory here is that meeting ppl's emotional needs would free them to think more critically about the fringe ideas- like, sometimes ppl…Quote tweet · Aug 3, 2022I’ve heard this sentiment quite a bit recently and feel it myself… downside of “only engage w ppl and content you like” ethos?…