this gets tackled lower in the stack than atp can’t run an atp server without a computer, cannot serve illegal content from computers in most jurisdictions takedown request goes through the ISP, not atp atproto has to handle “this person is XYZ, which is bad but not a crime” (as i understand)
ehhh the thing is ISPs pass the problem along w Terms of Service and cut off the entire service if it doesn't do enough to pick out the specific content for enforcement- traffic across the ISP is often encrypted so can't be more selective
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Apr 25, 2023ok duckie so the proposal is that ATP allows decentralization w many source nodes and aggregators and third party moderation tags and custom feed…Reply · Nov 9, 2021@ashleyrgold Where's the usual cybersecurity loophole allowing algos to filter abuse? Can't run the internet backbone without automated detection and…Reply · Oct 7, 2021@mcorliss Ah, BitTorrent's a good example- it didn't replace the internet, it stirs controversy with ISPs & great firewall & copyright holders, and…Reply · Oct 4, 2021@MalwareTechBlog @LainShot Or for their tier 1s to blackhole them for the sake of everyone else? Agree they presumably have massive infrastructure and…