I think in principle it's also about the risk that others get incited and might carry out the threat, even if not originally meant seriously. If the poster themselves has intent, then it's a case for the police. Banning won't do the trick.
yep, and the intimidation factor even if there's no real plan, and the norm of intimidation being ok, and frankly the potential for continued interactions between angry ppl to increase the risk of it getting serious...
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Mar 11, 2025@shinboson 🤔 idk, ig it's possible credible threat of mass casualties w political motive could be made via graffiti? do we have to wait till the plan…Reply · Jul 16, 2023the thing is, alice was banned for sarcastic hyperbolizing of what she'd previously said as a way of criticizing ppl for taking it seriously when…Reply · Apr 25, 2023@MySubliminalMSG @BasedBeffJezos talking about it != doing it... imo it should be automatically tagged so ppl can avoid reading upsetting posts, their…Reply · Dec 7, 2023@NhatbaoThaidoan maybe the fear is that you'd hurt someone with your action?