Development is accelerating. Everyone wants Bluesky to be federated and at scale quickly! "Official" features are nice but an open platform means devs can add features themselves: custom feeds, bots, clients, portable identities, open APIs, etc will (in time) get us users all the features we want.
I would love it if bsky offered a better identity solution than the app password situation ... 🫶
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Apr 12, 2023@paleoludic haha imo fragmented attention and desire for bsky devs to 10x so it can really become the one platform you useReply · Apr 27, 2023yeah.... imo some of the use cases are best solved by an encrypted messaging platform built atop AT protocol w DIDs for identity, and have bsky…Post · Apr 17, 2023what features would you like to see on bsky that might be implementable from the APIs? (like- suggestion list for devs who want to build something)Reply · Jul 5, 2023@twofifteenam yep, kinda wish bluesky had prioritized identity & federation over the feeds & mod tooling... I like open protocol social graph, DIDs,…