@felurian8 Half measures are unacceptable to both sides- if p(doom) is tiny / none then it IS a competition to control the outcome... if xrisk is high we should take extreme measures to halt progress... half and half just results in doom a bit later or China winning (depending who's right)
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Apr 1, 2023@RandolphCarterZ right imo we should be trying to collaborate on figuring out actual p(doom) not quibbling over whether he said use nukes or just be…Reply · Mar 29, 2023@TetraspaceWest be very insistent!!! my p(doom) is tiny, but it's sooo annoying when goal posts shift mid convo- I take MIRI at their word that they…Reply · Jun 8, 2023@daniel_271828 thinks p(doom) > .01%Reply · Sep 27, 2023@BishPlsOk I'll stick to my incremental wins while opposing big complex risky changes yes!