@HephaistosF sigh perhaps my point could have been worded better, but it was a response to his "it isn't violence if it is state sanctioned in accordance w treaties" and imo that's true once a treaty is signed but that realistically it wouldn't be freely agreed to by the entire globe
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Mar 30, 2023@plains_wraith haha I guess my point is that it's one thing to enforce a treaty/ law once it's been agreed to by a representative government without…Reply · Aug 18, 2023@a_musingcat the violence is the pointReply · Apr 18, 2023the point is kinda to not lay down a set of rules and then have someone litigate how they technically didn't violate them- like, it doesn't matterReply · Feb 2, 2023@gpurcell hah, even this feels dismissive / implies I'm violent? why is this supposed to feel good?