@losslandscape I want assurances I can continue running atop the same model: that my existing embeddings won't become incompatible w new ones, that I won't lose the botsonality I've carefully prompted on a particular model, that I won't be rate-limited or constrained by nanny-state RLHF
@losslandscape I don't want to choose between blindly clicking Accept on GDPR pop ups vs. wasting precious hours of life opting-out & blocking data collection in fact I want to be able to opt IN to more personally beneficial, family & friends sharing, public good data collection use cases
@losslandscape I don't want Proof of Humanity to block automation & accessibility for synthetic intelligences; I want to embrace AI white magic for my own consumer benefit- while having stronger defenses against the black magic of adtech & psyops & spam, human or bot generated
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Sep 19, 2023@andreivolt @ThatShawGuy probably we need to build a platform a layer above OpenAI ... let them focus on the models, it's a different skill set, the…Reply · Aug 23, 2023I feel like many ppl are very hard at work on the models & the hardware to deliver us better and better capabilities, but we're not preparing to make…Tweet · Nov 18, 2025i want the seamless ai future where my personal ai is omnipresent and context aware, orchestrating devices and services, planning logistics and…Reply · Aug 23, 2023I agree w cynicism abt "just a GPT-wrapper" startups - it is precarious to depend on an external API to supply the magic brains for your wrapper UX...…