@ESYudkowsky 🤔 more context, I think I'd been listening to Liron in a Spaces and commented in the GC that idk why he's insisting on arguing *literally any* goal when even a weaker form that just says many goals are compatible w superintelligence is enough to make the point they're not all aligned by default... I'm probably not the source of this, but if I am, I didn't intend to characterize your arguments, I was reacting to Liron & others and using strong / weak as the first words that came to mind to distinguish "most" from "literally all"
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Aug 25, 2023@MikePFrank @chrisprucha @liron yeah same wrt orthogonality- idk why ppl insist on the strong "literally any goal" when some are not compatible with…Reply · Oct 4, 2023@ESYudkowsky 🤔 I've said something like this in a GC once or twice, but was trying to explain my own opinion not say that you'd pushed two forms... I…Reply · Mar 2, 2025@YosarianTwo they matter wrt things like Liron's "Perfect Goal to Action Mapper" or Yud claiming that superintelligences would coordinate because they…Repost · Jan 5, 2023RT @yacineMTB: @deepfates @b3rduck EAs: we need to understand how to align super intelligent agents to ensure the continued existence of hu…