@accelerationem @bayeslord https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/sustainability/project-natick-underwater-datacenter/ I think there are arguments in favor of this plan, obvs you'd do many containers for redundancy & incremental replacement / expansion
More notes on nearby ideas
Reply · Sep 5, 2024@Duderichy radiators + shielding / increased failures / no physical access for maintenance + mass & packing limits for launch + worse backbone…Cloud & infrastructure · EnergyReply · Dec 7, 2021@mattparlmer 🤣 I mean, it is probably a good thing that non-essentials are just thrown into the cheapest most central datacenters... Idle capacity is…Reply · Mar 5, 2023@ESYudkowsky @pmarca move to DC and lobby for nuclear energy style red tape around datacenters & chips?Reply · Oct 8, 2024@VA_JET @davidgura @pwcdanica boo i'm a local and want to keep the datacenters expanding here vs elsewhere... we should let them go higher and build…Cloud & infrastructure · Cities & urbanism